"E.H.P.B., W.A.Br." study of the labour force as an element in the process of production. The labour
            force comprises all those who work for gain, whether as employees, employers, or as
            self-employed, and it includes the unemployed who are seeking work. Labour economics
            involves the study of the factors affecting the efficiency of these workers, their
            deployment between different industries and occupations, and the determination of their
            pay. In developing models for the study of these factors, this section deals with the
            labour force of contemporary industrialized economies.
            The economist cannot study the
            capabilities, jobs, and earnings of men and women without taking account of psychology,
            social structures, cultures, and the activities of government. Indeed, these forces often
            play a more conspicuous part in the field of labour than do the market forces with which
            economic theory is mainly concerned. The most important reason for this arises from the
            peculiar nature of labour as a commodity. The act of hiring of labour, unlike that of
            hiring a machine, is necessary but not sufficient for the completion of work. Employees
            have to be motivated to work to an acceptable standard; the employment contract is, in
            effect, open-ended. This may be no problem when employees are weak and easily replaced,
            but the more skilled, organized, and indispensible they are, the more the care that must
            be given to creating an institutional setting that will win their compliance and meet
            their notions of fairness.
            A second major reason for
            looking beyond straightforward labour market forces is the often highly imperfect nature
            of the industrialized labour market. The majority of jobs are occupied by the same
            employees for many years, and only a small minority of employees quits their jobs in order
            to move to a comparable job that is better paid. Studies in a number of countries have all
            revealed substantial variation in the level of pay offered for the same job by different
            firms in the same local labour market. This sluggishness of labour market response is
            particularly notable for more skilled labour and for labour employed by firms in strong
            product market positions. The main thrust of competition in many instances comes not
            through the labour market but through the product market, with an employee's pay being
            determined less by what the job is than by who the employer is.
            In discussing
            both market and nonmarket forces in labour economics, the following discussion poses them
            not as alternatives but as complementary explanations. The difference in pay between, for
            example, a craftsman and the labourer who works alongside him may be fixed by custom, an
            arbitrator, a job evaluation system, or a bargain with a trade union. In their different
            ways these are far from being merely passive agents through which market forces are
            transmitted into human behaviour. They may, for instance, shape the market by defining its
            categories of labour. Also, they may differ greatly in their speed and extent of response.
            The
            comparative study of wage movements in different periods and countries does show many
            similarities and regularities that are more marked than the variety of their settings
            would lead one to expect. This evidence of the influence of persistent forces working
            within an equilibrating system is one justification for the economist's speaking of a
            labour market. But there is much in labour that can be understood only with the aid of the
            psychologist, the sociologist, the historian, the labour lawyer, or the political
            scientist. Depending upon both the circumstances and the purpose for which the explanation
            is required, it is an empirical question how far the forces that these scientists study
            might interact with the market forces that are the special province of the economist.